Comparative Accuracy of Manual Versus Computerized Electrocardiographic Measurement of J-, ST- and T-Wave Deviations in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Accurate and rapid electrocardiographic interpretation is of crucial importance in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Computerized electrocardiographic algorithms are often used in out-of-hospital settings. Their accuracy should be carefully validated in ACS, particularly in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This study evaluated the comparative accuracy of lead-specific computer-based versus manual measurements of the J-point, ST-segment, and T-wave deviations in standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) (excluding lead aVR). Sixty-nine consecutive patients with suspected ACS were included. The interobserver reliability in the determination of ST-segment deviation ≥0.2 mV in leads V2 and V3 was very good (κ = 0.94 and 0.93, respectively). Agreement between a cardiologist and the computer regarding ST elevation ≥0.2 mV in lead V2 was moderate (κ = 0.72) and in V3 was very good (κ = 0.85). For ST depression or elevation ≥0.05 mV in lead LIII, agreement was good and moderate (κ = 0.79 and 0.51, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated clinically acceptable limits of agreement comparing measurements of the J point and the T wave, but clinically inadequate limits of agreement with respect to ST-segment deviation, between the electrocardiographer and the computer. The optimal cut-off points were 0.115 mV (sensitivity 89%, specificity 98%) for the computer program to detect ST elevation ≥0.2 mV and 0.045 mV (sensitivity 74%, specificity 99%) for revealing ST elevation ≥0.1 mV. It was found that automatically measured ST-segment deviations were smaller than those manually measured. In conclusion, a correction should be performed to obtain optimal results in the automated analysis of ECGs, because the results have important implications for clinical decision making.