American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 7 , Pages 911-918, 1 April 2008

Angina Pectoris and Atherosclerotic Risk Factors in the Multisite Cardiac Lifestyle Intervention Program

Received 31 July 2007; received in revised form 13 November 2007; accepted 13 November 2007. published online 29 January 2008.

Cardiovascular symptom relief is a major indicator for revascularization procedures. To examine the effects of intensive lifestyle modification on symptom relief, we investigated changes in angina pectoris, coronary risk factors, quality of life, and lifestyle behaviors in patients with stable coronary artery disease enrolled in the multisite cardiac lifestyle intervention program, an ongoing health insurance–covered lifestyle intervention conducted at 22 sites in the united states. Patients with coronary artery disease (nonsmokers; 757 men, 395 women; mean age 61 years) were asked to make changes in diet (10% calories from fat, plant based), engage in moderate exercise (3 hours/week), and practice stress management (1 hour/day). At baseline, 108 patients (43% women) reported mild angina and 174 patients (37% women) reported limiting angina. By 12 weeks, 74% of these patients were angina free, and an additional 9% moved from limiting to mild angina. This improvement in angina was significant for patients with mild and limiting angina at baseline regardless of gender (p <0.01). Significant improvements in cardiac risk factors, quality of life, and lifestyle behaviors were observed, and patients with angina who became angina free by 12 weeks showed the greatest improvements in exercise capacity, depression, and health-related quality of life (p <0.05). In conclusion, the observed improvements in angina in patients making intensive lifestyle changes could drastically reduce their need for revascularization procedures.

 

 This study was supported by U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity Grant W81XWH-06-2-0565 from the Department of the Army, Fort Detrick, Maryland; and Health Resources and Services Administration Grant 4C76HF00803-01-01 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, and does not reflect the position or the policy of the government.

PII: S0002-9149(07)02320-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.039

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 101, Issue 7 , Pages 911-918, 1 April 2008