Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 61-65 (1 July 1998)


View previous. 4 of 27 View next.

Treatment patterns and distribution of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in treatment-eligible united states adults

Thomas J. Hoerger, PhDaCorresponding Author Information, Mohan V. Bala, PhDb, Jeremy W. Bray, MSa, Timothy C. Wilcosky, PhDa, John LaRosa, MDc

Received 5 December 1997; received in revised form 11 February 1998; accepted 11 February 1998. published online 16 August 2004.

Abstract 

To estimate the fraction of United States (U.S.) adults who are eligible for treatment to reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels based on Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II) guidelines and the percent reduction in LDL cholesterol required by those who qualify for treatment, we analyzed data on 7,423 respondents to Phase 2 of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) administered between 1991 and 1994. Approximately 28% of the U.S. adult population aged ≥20 years is eligible for treatment based on ATP II guidelines. Eighty-two percent of adults with coronary heart disease are not at their target LDL cholesterol level of 100 mg/dl. Of those eligible for treatment, 65% report that they receive no treatment. Overall, 40% of people who qualify for drug therapy require an LDL cholesterol reduction of >30% to meet their ATP II treatment goal. Approximately 75% of those with coronary heart disease who qualify for drug therapy require an LDL cholesterol reduction of >30%. Although elevated LDL cholesterol levels can be treated, prevalence rates in the U.S. adult population remain high. Several recent studies indicate that a considerable percentage of people treated with drug therapy do not reach their treatment goals. The findings in this study provide at least a partial explanation for why many patients receiving therapy do not reach their treatment goals: they require a larger reduction in LDL cholesterol than many therapies can provide.

a Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

b Centocor, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA

c Tulane University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprints: Thomas J. Hoerger, PhD, Center for Economics Research, Research Triangle Institute, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

 This study was supported in part by Parke-Davis and Pfizer, Inc.

PII: S0002-9149(98)00227-6


View previous. 4 of 27 View next.