American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 109, Issue 4 , Pages 451-454, 15 February 2012

Comparison of Role of Early (Less Than Six Hours) to Later (More Than Six Hours) or No Cardiac Catheterization After Resuscitation From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

  • Justin A. Strote, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Charles Maynard, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Michele Olsufka, RN

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Graham Nichol, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Michael K. Copass, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Leonard A. Cobb, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Francis Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 206-744-8712; fax: 206-744-2224

Received 4 August 2011; received in revised form 29 September 2011; accepted 29 September 2011. published online 21 November 2011.

Despite reports of patients with resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (rSCA) receiving acute cardiac catheterization, the efficacy of this strategy is largely unknown. We hypothesized that acute cardiac catheterization of patients with rSCA would improve survival to hospital discharge. A retrospective cohort of 240 patients with out-of-hospital rSCA caused by ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was identified from 11 institutions in Seattle, Washington from 1999 through 2002. Patients were grouped into those receiving acute catheterization within 6 hours (≤6-hour group, n = 61) and those with deferred catheterization at >6 hours or no catheterization during the index hospitalization (>6-hour group, n = 179). Attention was directed to survival to hospital discharge, neurologic status, extent of coronary artery disease, presenting electrocardiographic findings, and symptoms before arrest. Propensity-score methods were used to adjust for the likelihood of receiving acute catheterization. Survival was greater in patients who underwent acute catheterization (72% in the ≤6-hour group vs 49% in the >6-hour group, p = 0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 38 of 61 patients (62%) in the ≤6-hour group and 13 of 170 patients (7%) in the >6-hour group (p <0.0001). Neurologic status was similar in the 2 groups. A significantly larger percentage of patients in the acute catheterization group had symptoms before cardiac arrest and had ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram after resuscitation. Age, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, daytime presentation, history of percutaneous coronary intervention or stroke, and acute ST-segment elevation were positively associated with receiving cardiac catheterization. In conclusion, in this series of patients who sustained out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, acute catheterization (<6 hours of presentation) was associated with improved survival.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a grant from the Medic One Foundation, Seattle, Washington, and Grant RO1 HL089554 from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr. Kim).

PII: S0002-9149(11)03027-X

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.036

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 109, Issue 4 , Pages 451-454, 15 February 2012