« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 106, Issue 3
, Pages 337-341
, 1 August 2010
Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention (from a Multicenter Southern California Registry)
References
- . Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:616–626
- . Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;89:248–258
- . Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2149–2156
- . Contemporary results show repeat coronary artery bypass grafting remains a risk factor for operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1386–1391
- . Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:1140–1146
- . Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:740–747
- . Comparison of stenting and balloon angioplasty for narrowings in aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits in place for more than five years. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:13–18
- . Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1557–1563
- . Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1020–1029
- . Sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;294:819–825
- . A meta-analysis of trials comparing Cypher and Taxus stents in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61:720–726
- . A meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1373–1380
- . Comparative safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stent: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2008;155:630–639
- . A randomized controlled trial of a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a similar bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:919–928
- . Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2423–2431
- . Increased late mortality after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in diseased saphenous vein grafts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:261–267
- . Efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2006;19:121–125
- . Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents: comparison of short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2008;8:431–436
- . Risk of thrombosis with the use of sirolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention (from registry and clinical trial data). Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1469–1472
- . What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention?: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:941–946
- . Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from a pooled analysis including 10 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:954–959
- . Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Med. 2006;119:1056–1061
- . Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:667–678
- . Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:998–1008
PII: S0002-9149(10)00779-4
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.030
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 106, Issue 3
, Pages 337-341
, 1 August 2010
