« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 8
, Pages 1055-1062
, 15 October 2009
Impact of an Initial Strategy of Medical Therapy Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in High-Risk Patients From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial
References
- . Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–1516
- . Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:677–687
- . Design and rationale of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program no. 424. Am Heart J. 2006;151:1173–1179
- . ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:159–168
- . ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1366–1374
- . Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333–341
- . Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:1240–1244
- . Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation. 2002;106:43–49
- . Disease-specific health status after stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery trial. Circulation. 2003;108:1694–1700
- . Acute coronary syndromes: unstable angina and non–Q-wave myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:1195–1206
- . Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997;278:2093–2098
- . Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20
- . Association of revascularisation with low mortality in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a report from GUSTO IV-ACS. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1494–1501
- . Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;293:2908–2917
- . Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–1291
- . Outcomes following coronary stenting in the era of bare-metal vs the era of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2008;299:2868–2876
- . Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in Ontario. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1393–1402
- . Long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting and bare-metal stenting in Massachusetts. Circulation. 2008;118:1817–1827
- . Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1030–1039
- . A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:989–997
- . Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:937–948
- . Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1933–1945
This work was supported by the Cooperative Studies Program of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development [Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program no. 424]; in collaboration with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; and by unrestricted research grants from Merck (Whitehouse Station, New Jersey), Pfizer (New York, New York), Bristol-Myers-Squibb (New York, New York), Fujisawa (Tokyo, Japan), Kos Pharmaceuticals (Abbott Park, Illinois), Datascope (Fairfield, New Jersey), AstraZeneca (London, United Kingdom), Key Pharmaceutical (Sydney, Australia), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), First Horizon (Alpharetta, Georgia), and GE Healthcare (Waukesha, Wisconsin). All industrial funding in support of the trial was directed through the United States Department of Veterans Affairs.
PII: S0002-9149(09)01179-5
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.056
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 104, Issue 8
, Pages 1055-1062
, 15 October 2009
