American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 12 , Pages 1675-1681 , 15 June 2009

Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Efficacy of 64-Slice Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

  • Dharam J. Kumbhani, MD, SM

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • ,
  • Christopher P. Ingelmo, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • ,
  • Paul Schoenhagen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • ,
  • Ronan J. Curtin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • ,
  • Scott D. Flamm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • ,
  • Milind Y. Desai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 216-445-5250; fax: 216-445-6155

Received 2 December 2008 ,Revised 10 February 2009 ,Accepted 10 February 2009.

References 

  1. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896–1910
  2. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, et al ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–1497
  3. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25
  4. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188
  5. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:882–893
  6. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560
  7. Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med. 1993;12:1293–1316
  8. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-Disc (A software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:31
  9. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, Katoh O, Matsubara T, Terashima M, et al Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J. 2006;70:564–571
  10. Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, Kirchin MA, Wintersperger BJ, Johnson TR, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1465–1473
  11. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D, Baum U, Kuettner A, Ropers U, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2567–2572
  12. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Malagutti P, Valgimigli M, Meijboom WB, et al Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2006;114:645–653
  13. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Jukema JW, Maffei E, et al Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2204–2210
  14. Carrabba N, Bamoshmoosh M, Carusi LM, Parodi G, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1754–1758
  15. Das KM, El-Menyar AA, Salam AM, Singh R, Dabdoob WA, Albinali HA, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment. Radiology. 2007;245:424–432
  16. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography—initial experience. Radiology. 2007;242:403–409
  17. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Tuinenburg JC, van der Hoeven BL, et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology. 2007;245:416–423
  18. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:234–243
  19. Hecht HS, Zaric M, Jelnin V, Lubarsky L, Prakash M, Roubin G. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:820–824
  20. Manghat N, Van Lingen R, Hewson P, Syed F, Kakani N, Cox I, et al. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1567–1573
  21. Nakamura K, Funabashi N, Uehara M, Suzuki K, Terao M, Okubo K, et al. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2008;130:349–356
  22. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, Alberghina F, Otsuka M, Meijboom WB, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–854
  23. Hamon M, Champ-Rigot L, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:217–225
  24. Worster A, Innes G, Abu-Laban RB. Diagnostic testing: an emergency medicine perspective. CJEM. 2002;4:348–354
  25. Ong AT, van Domburg RT, Aoki J, Sonnenschein K, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stents remain superior to bare-metal stents at two years: medium-term results from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1356–1360
  26. Choi HS, Choi BW, Choe KO, Choi D, Yoo KJ, Kim MI, et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics. 2004;24:787–800
  27. Dori G, Denekamp Y, Fishman S, Bitterman H. Exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for detecting restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a review of performance. J Intern Med. 2003;253:253–262
  28. Galassi AR, Tamburino C. Follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Ital Heart J. 2005;6:530–539
  29. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290–1305
  30. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191–197

 The Cleveland Clinic receives modest research support from Siemens Medical Solutions and Philips Medical Systems.

PII: S0002-9149(09)00599-2

doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.024

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 103, Issue 12 , Pages 1675-1681 , 15 June 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution