Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages 1500-1505 (1 June 2009)


View previous. 6 of 34 View next.

Comparison of the Effects of Ramipril Versus Telmisartan on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Endothelial Progenitor Cells After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Italo Porto, MD, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Luca Di Vito, MDa, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, MDa, Ilaria Dato, MDa, Alessandra Tritarelli, MSca, Antonio Maria Leone, MD, PhDa, Giampaolo Niccoli, MD, PhDa, Maurizio C. Capogrossi, MDb, Luigi Marzio Biasucci, MD, PhDa, Filippo Crea, MDa

Received 4 November 2008; received in revised form 31 January 2009; accepted 31 January 2009.

To compare the anti-inflammatory and endothelial progenitor cell mobilizing effects of ramipril and telmisartan in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 42 patients with ACS were randomized after successful percutaneous coronary intervention to ramipril 5 mg/day (22 patients) or telmisartan 80 mg/day (20 patients). Peripheral blood samples were drawn at baseline and at 20 days to measure high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and to assess 4 populations of progenitor cells by flow cytometry, namely CD34+/KDR+, CD34+/CD133+, CD34+/CD133+/CD45, and CD34+/KDR+/CD45 cells. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, similar in the 2 groups at baseline, were significantly more decreased by telmisartan than by ramipril at follow up (p = 0.013 for time-by-drug interaction). The main effect for time was also significant (p <0.001). CD34+/KDR+ and CD34+/CD133+ cells were similar at baseline and did not change over time (p = 0.2 and p = 0.1, respectively). In contrast, for CD34+/KDR+/CD45 and CD34+/CD133+/CD45 cells, a significant increase with time was seen (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002, respectively) and no differential effect of either drug was seen. In conclusion, telmisartan shows a more potent anti-inflammatory effect than ramipril after an ACS. The 2 drugs do not show a differential effect on endothelial progenitor cell mobilization.

a Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

b Laboratorio di Patologia Vascolare, Istituto Dermopatico Immacolata–IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 3906-30-15-41-87; fax: 3906-30-55-535

 This study was supported by a grant from the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Roma to UNICATT Cord Blood Bank of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

PII: S0002-9149(09)00534-7

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.370


View previous. 6 of 34 View next.