Requirement for Emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Stent Era

References 

1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361:13–20
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (409 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Peels HO, de Swart H, Ploeg TV, Hautvast RW, Cornel JH, Arnold AE, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with off-site cardiac surgery backup for acute myocardial infarction as a strategy to reduce door-to-balloon time. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1353–1358
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (163 KB)
   • CrossRef
3. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Rihal CS, Singh M. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2004–2009
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (97 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Seshadri N, Whitlow PL, Acharya N, Houghtaling P, Blackstone EH, Ellis SG. Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Circulation. 2002;106:2346–2350
   • CrossRef
5. Kutcher MA. Percutaneous Coronary Interventions at Facilities Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). ACC. 2008;
6. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Siewers AE, Kellett MA, Malenka DJ. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without and with onsite coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2004;292:1961–1968
   • CrossRef