American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 8 , Pages 1188-1191, 15 April 2006

Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk of Noncardiac Surgery Following Coronary Angioplasty With Versus Without Stenting

  • David Leibowitz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Maurice Cohen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
  • ,
  • David Planer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Morris Mosseri, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • David Rott, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • Chaim Lotan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • ,
  • A. Teddy Weiss, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospitals of Mount Scopus and Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Tel: 972-2584-4524; fax: 972-2584-4113

Received 15 May 2005; received in revised form 2 November 2005; accepted 2 November 2005. published online 07 March 2006.

Previous studies have shown a high incidence of cardiovascular complications when noncardiac surgery (NCS) is performed after coronary stenting. No study has compared the outcomes of NCS after stenting compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone. The records of all patients who underwent NCS within 3 months of percutaneous coronary intervention at our institution were reviewed for adverse clinical events with the end points of acute myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and death ≤6 months after NCS. A total of 216 consecutive patients were included in the study. Of these, 122 (56%) underwent PTCA and 94 (44%) underwent stenting. A total of 26 patients (12%) died, 13 in the stent group (14%) and 13 in the PTCA group (11%), a nonsignificant difference. The incidence of acute myocardial infarction and major bleeding was 7% and 16% in the stent group and 6% and 13% in the PTCA group (p = NS), respectively. Significantly more events occurred in the 2 groups when NCS was performed within 2 weeks of percutaneous coronary intervention. In conclusion, our study has demonstrated high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality after NCS in patients undergoing PTCA alone, as well as stenting. These findings support the current guidelines regarding the risk of NCS after stenting but suggest they be extended to PTCA as well.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0002-9149(06)00041-5

doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.037

American Journal of Cardiology
Volume 97, Issue 8 , Pages 1188-1191, 15 April 2006